Home of the jester in the court of the ragtag soldiers.
Archive for May, 2009
You Can’t Say That!
May 31st
In a post the other day I mentioned Song Of The South, which is based on Joel Chandler Harris’ stories for children. In one of them, Br’er Rabbit temporarily falls victim to a trap set by Br’er Fox and Br’er Bear — well, mostly by Br’er Fox — who construct a dummy made out of tar, the idea being since everyone in the briar patch always exchanged greetings the dummy’s silence when greeted by Br’er Rabbit would so enrage him into order to teach the dummy a lesson he’d throw a punch which the moment it landed would trap him. Channeling Redd Foxx for a moment, now who’s the dummy, dummy? Oh, and the dummy was referred to as ‘tar baby’ because it was, you know, made out of tar.
All the tar baby was — all it ever was — was a trap set to exploit Br’er Rabbit’s hair-triggered temper. Or is that hare-triggered temper. But I digress. There were no racial overtones or insinuations. The tar baby was black because… now brace yourself… that’s what color tar is. If it would have been made out of resin it would have been amber in color. That all said, given how playing the perpetual victim means being perpetually outraged the term tar baby has been appropriated by some in the African-American community as a racial slur. It was never intended to be one, but since when has that stopped anyone?
We live in a society where one can assert any level superiority based on ethnicity one wishes as long as you’re not white. And don’t you dare say anything about it, cracker. The whole Sonia Sotomayo “wise Latina woman” brouhaha has already been hashed to death; no need to go through it all again. This duly noted, it must be added she’s hardly alone in placing ethnic identification above all else as a qualifier. America is inundated with those who chant the diversity mantra yet define diversity as I me me mine. The words of Paul (“Do not lie to each other, since you have taken off your old self with its practices and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge in the image of its Creator. Here there is no Greek or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all. Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience”) are far, far removed from the minds and hearts of this land. Which makes the next words of Paul (“Bear with each other and forgive whatever grievances you may have against one another. Forgive as the Lord forgave you”) mighty tough to follow sometimes. But I’ll keep at it, as all believers must do.
Hopefully without getting frustrated enough to try and punch out a tar baby.
Quick Question
May 30th
When is it going to stop being so f’n hard for me to write anything?
I start. I stop. I start again. I get distracted. I spend hours doing nothing but surfing the Net or listening to music or watching videos. Anything but writing.
I have idea upon idea tumbling through my head begging to get out. Yet the moment I start trying to get them out, the process comes to a screeching halt.
And I don’t know why.
Is it depression? Frustration?
Or is God trying to tell me something? That I’m not writing what he wants me to write?
If that’s the case, how I wish I knew what it was He wants me to communicate. Because I don’t know.
I honestly don’t know.
All I know is this sucks. Big time.
And I hope it ends very, very soon.
Zip-A-Dee-Doo-WHAT?!!
May 29th
Disney’s Song Of The South is a movie universally condemned by those who’ve never seen it. The assumption that a movie set in a plantation located in the postbellum South… well, actually that’s one of the biggest misconceptions about the movie. “How come all the blacks look happy? They’re slaves!!!” No, no they’re not. Slaves, that is. As to the happy and singing part… you know this is a Disney movie, right? The only people in any Disney movie who aren’t singing and happy are the bad guys. And they’re usually singing and happy as well. Happy in their own way, namely perpetrating evil until they get their inevitable comeuppance. Have I mentioned this is a Disney movie?
Anyway, since the movie doesn’t depict in gloriously gory detail each black character as noble and longsuffering at the hands of their evil white used to be slave but now reduced to task masters, obviously it’s racist. Never mind how the movie shows white and black kids playing together with no consideration except having fun, or that the main black character, the masterful storyteller Uncle Remus, has so much more rural street smarts than the rest of the cast put together he’s lapped the field three times before they’ve so much as flipped on the ignition switch. No, since it’s not what people who: 1) have ever had the slightest association with children, having apparently never been one themselves, and 2) wouldn’t know their laughing place is actually where everyone else gathers to laugh at them consider PC, the movie is hidden well out of sight.
Sort of.
Although the movie has never been released in the United States in any format of home video, it did see the light of day during the ’80s and very early ’90s on videotape in Europe and laserdisc in parts of Asia. Disneyphiles (a/k/a devoted Disney collectors), being the insanely passionate lot they are, have lovingly preserved as many copies of these releases as possible, spending whatever it takes to do so. Need to shell out big bucks for a VCR capable of playing the PAL format of European VHS tapes? Not a problem. Throw around mind-boggling amounts of cash for a laserdisc plus a player that actually still works? Money is no object. Nothing stands in-between a Disneyphile and the prize they seek. Or at least it won’t stand for long.
Now, to say Disney is both thorough and aggressive when it comes to protecting its material ranks right alongside “I hear you like Sarah Palin, Jerry” in the understatement of the millennium category. This explains why ten seconds on Google will get you ten different sites selling Song Of The South copied from either the aforementioned laserdisc or VHS tape onto a DVD. Some of the sites are so brazen they use “songofthesouth” as part of their Web address. They couldn’t be any more blatant about what they’re doing than if they set up shop on Main Street USA.
Disney’s response?
“Hey, did you know we’re re-releasing Snow White in November?”
It’s difficult not to believe Disney is deliberately turning a blind eye to overt piracy because it gets them out of having to genuinely deal with the demand — over 120,000 people have signed a petition asking Disney to give the movie a proper release on DVD — of at bare minimum the collectors for a copy, hoping the public at large will gradually forget the movie exists. Why? Apparently they’re so deathly afraid someone will scream racism they’re too chicken to, oh, tell the truth about the movie and give a truly wonderful film (yes, I have a copy) the release it deserves. In the meanwhile, every kid who’s ever heard “Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah” will continue to not have the slightest notion where the song came from. And that’s no laughing place for anyone.
Happy To Be Humbled
May 28th
An old friend newly made — she’s nowhere near old, but you get the idea — and dear sister in the Lord mentioned a Scripture yesterday: “Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position [NOTE: This can also be translated as "willing to do menial work"]. Do not be conceited.”
Me being me, naturally I chimed in with a “as I often remind everyone, I am a truly humble man” comment. At which point in time she challenged me to a humble-off. My offerings thus far have been that I’m so humble:
- The air I breathe has to force its way into my lungs because I don’t want to bother it by drawing it in myself;
- When I go fishing the fish have to swim up to me and beg for permission to jump in my boat because I can’t bring myself to put my hook in the water.
Yeah, weird Christian humor. Gets us through the unfunny times.
The reason I mention this is, other than the obvious “if that’s your idea of being witty you really do have something to be humble about” comment, is because something took place yesterday that truly did humble me. We tend to think of being humbled as being humiliated in defeated, our illusions about ourselves shattered by reality of someone or something triumphing over us. That’s not always the case. Sometimes, being humbled means standing in awe of a moment when perfect God works through imperfect people, namely us, to carry out something we in and of ourselves could never bring about. Yet because somewhere along the line we were not only willing to do what He asked us to do but actually did it, that which we could never accomplish was in fact accomplished.
Shortly after I started working in earnest on the book, I decided I wanted to include at least one metal band from that era. The one that immediately came to mind was Barnabas, since despite their skill — their music still holds up — they were something of the music industry’s unwanted stepchild. Also, the band had an active fan-run message board to which at least one of the members regularly contributed. So I made contact with the member, namely Kris Klingensmith (drummer and lyricist), and did the interview. He was kind enough to provide contact information for a couple of former bandmates: Mick Donner, who played guitar on the band’s second album, and Nancyjo Mann who was the lead singer throughout the band’s recorded history. Made the calls, did the interviews. I had a vague memory of Mann being involved in the pro-life movement, but didn’t know the full story until she provided it in unvarnished detail. Her story is one of the book’s most sobering moments.
Fast forward to that period of time earlier this year between the book being completed then sent off to the publisher and its release. Being one who works in marketing yet intensely dislikes sales (makes for some interesting internal conundrums), how to get the word out about the book without being obtrusive was, and is, a challenge. I’m a firm believer in networking and social media as it offers the opportunity for mutual marketing; an exchange of assistance. Much better than beating someone over the head with your message, methinks. Therefore, I started looking for opportunities to put this belief in action.
Since I’m a twit… uh, am on Twitter a lot I of course looked there. One day, one of the people I follow made mention of her actively working in the pro-life movement and looking for stories from people who had personal experience with abortion. Said person had a couple of blogs of her own that are well-read and is a participant in assorted political organizations.
Hmm.
An agenda item I’ve picked up on over the years is the need to be wise with what you have been given; i.e. as you receive so you should give but don’t throw it out there willy-nilly as Willy can pay for it like everyone else. This is why the book isn’t available digitally and won’t be for quite some time. I simply can’t afford to give it away wholesale. Not that I’m looking to get rich here; due to not being in possession of a time machine thus being unable to return to the 80s and own a certain record label this is not an option. I’m not hoping to so much as break even on the travel and communication expenses incurred in the course of writing the book. I also can’t afford to be handing it out on the street corner. Anyway, said all that to set up the following.
One of the oft-used methods of promoting a book is the teaser, this consisting of making a small portion, usually a single chapter, freely available. The hope is this sample will prove enticing to those who read it, so much so at least some will be motivated to purchase the book so they can read the rest of the story. Now, in the case of a book such as mine where each chapter is an entity in and of itself there is the potential downside of losing a sale to someone whose primary if not sole reason for buying it is obtaining that one chapter. However, two factors weigh against this. The first is how I’ve never encountered a scenario where more than one artist in the book is not of interest to a potential buyer. The second, one that factors into all marketing considerations for the book, is the ministerial element. Not everything can be squeezed into a spreadsheet.
Hmm…
“Hi. I just finished a book that has a chapter you may find of interest. If you’d like to run it in your blog and in the process of doing so mention the book…”
She agreed and in a few days time did so, mentioning the book and in a separate post reprinting Mann’s chapter. Now that she was aware of Mann’s story, she also ran an article from several years ago about Mann’s experience.
A young woman pregnant with her third child read that story. Her mother was pressuring her to have an abortion as her husband had left her and her mother didn’t believe she could handle the two children, both under five, she already had let alone another. Her mother arranged for her to go to a clinic and abort her pregnancy.
She went to the clinic.
She thought about Mann’s story.
She didn’t end her pregnancy.
The story doesn’t end there, of course. It cannot end there. A sacred obligation for deeds not just words is pressed on the heart of every believer. In this case, be it directly or through an organization there is a mandate from God to offer what support, financial and other, one can both during the pregnancy and after birth to moms-to-be who choose life. Yet even with this there is the breathtaking, awe-inspiring moment of realization that this stumbling fumbling bumbling sinnerboy, namely me, was used by God as part of a process giving an unborn child the opportunity to be born.
Never been happier to be humbled in my life.
Try Reality
May 26th
The California Supreme Court has spoken. Prop 8 stands as written. All same-sex marriages already done stand. Let the protests begin. Whatever. As I said a few weeks ago, I’m not terribly interested in the subject of gay marriage right now. There are far too many far more important issues facing us all. However, that said I’m not entirely without interest in the subject or empathy for those directly involved. I have gay friends. I’ve counseled more than a few of them about their relationships. Not in a “you God-cursed sodomite” fashion, but in the same manner I’ve counseled men and women who were together about their relationship. They are who and what they are. I have no problem with that. None. With that as a backdrop, a few words on the subject.
- Stop whining. Look. The people of California have voted — twice — to define marriage as an institution between one man and one woman. Sorry you don’t like that. But that’s how they’ve voted. Twice. Crying about the “tyranny of the majority” and all that is not going to curry favor, and it’s not going to change anyone’s mind, and it is not going to change the final vote tally. So quit complaining about Prop 8. The election is over. The outcome is settled. Hey, I really don’t like how the presidential election came out last November. But when the votes were counted and Obama won, I accepted it. Make peace with reality. You’re hurting only yourself if you don’t.
- Don’t try to put it back on the ballot next year. In case it’s escaped your attention, California is getting really tired of voting every fifteen minutes. Statewide we voted twice in 2000, twice in 2002, once in 2003, twice in 2004, once in 2005, twice in 2006, three times in 2008, and once so far in 2009. If I missed any, feel free to correct me. Anyway, the point is between the total number of elections (fourteen) and propositions (something close to if not over two hundred), the populace is disenchanted to say the least. And you want to run something out there again that’s been voted on twice? Don’t be shocked if it’s not greeted with thunderous applause.
- Understand what the court said today. It ruled the process used for Prop 8 was constitutional, namely that the state constitution could be amended in the fashion it was. It wasn’t a ruling for or against gay marriage. It was an assertion that the mechanics of the vote and the proposition were constitutional. The majority of voters voted for it. So be it. Next case, please.
- You still have the right to register as domestic partners. Crying discrimination at this point is the same as those who scream oppression due to the color of their skin and because of it they can never get ahead in this society and… oh, wait, who’s in the Oval Office these days? But I digress. Have you ever read the law in question? It says and I quote: “Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, whether they derive from statutes, administrative regulations, court rules, government policies, common law, or any other provisions or sources of law, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.” And by the way, a man and woman cannot register as domestic partners unless they are both over 62 and one or both qualifies for old age insurance benefits under Social Security. But again I digress. In short, the only difference between registered domestic partnership and marriage is the name of the institution. Sorry if that offends you on a social level. The law is not a social declaration. Social and legal are two different animals, and legally you’re still covered.
- It’s up to you to state why this doesn’t open Pandora’s box, not me. If the definition of who can marry is changed from one man and one woman to two consenting adults because not doing so is discriminatory, you tell me on what legal grounds you can then oppose polygamy if all parties consent or incestuous marriage if both parties consent. This isn’t the nonsensical hysteria of “I want to marry my golf clubs and/or cow.” This is legit. You answer the questions. I already gave you my answer as to who can marry.
Again, look. You lost. I’m sorry if you feel pain because of it. But please look around. North Korea is rattling a nuclear-tipped saber in the direction of South Korea. Israel is ready and willing to launch an attack against Iran, using nuclear weapons if need be, should it feel there is an imminent danger of Iran developing its own nuclear weapons for the purpose of using them against Israel. Pakistan is in dire straits with a threatened takeover of the entire country, including its nuclear arsenal, by the Taliban. American soldiers are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. The present administration is actively pursuing an economic plan of government-owned and run business. The economy is in tatters. We are as a nation drowning in debt, yet our political leaders continue to spend money like a drunken sailor on shore leave after six months at sea. In short, we’ve got problems. And quite frankly, right now your hurt feelings over a societal, not legal slight don’t rate very high on the scale. Capiche?
Shameless Self-Promotion
May 26th
I’ll be on the radio in a few minutes at http://www.crossrhythms.co.uk/radio talking about the book. Tune in!
Memorial Day
May 25th
It was something we did every year, my father and I. I would call him, and when he answered would say, “Well, I’d wish you a happy Memorial Day. But it’s not really happy, now is it.”
“No, so. No, it’s not.”
My father occasionally talked about serving in World War Two and Korea, of missions flown and friends lost. He spoke of the missions freely. The friends? Not so much. The decades may have dulled the pain, but they could never take it away.
Which was as it should be, really.
God bless those who served and never came home.
“whom the gods would destroy…”
May 24th
Barry McGuire was one of the first artists, if not the very first, from the regular music world to enter into what back then was called “Jesus music” which later on garnered the name contemporary Christian music (among other names which can’t be repeated here… but I digress). Fortunately he survived the industry with his faith intact, and today in his mid-seventies is still going strong, touring regularly and basically enjoying life.
In 1976, McGuire recorded an album entitled C’mon Along. It’s one of my favorites by him, and its unavailability either on CD or digitally has long been a sore spot. Fortunately, I recently found someone kind enough to burn an excellent quality CD-R of the album, thus returning it to my library as I am currently without functioning turntable.
My favorite song on the album bears a title most unusual for a gospel record, namely “Whom The Gods Would Destroy.” You don’t see a lot of symbolic song titles in CCM. Or allegorical, or metaphoric. Which is a pity, given how rich a tradition there is in Scripture of symbolic and/or allegorical and/or metaphoric language. Ah well.
While the line comes from a play by the ancient Greek playwright Euripides (I mentioned it in a post a while back), the song takes a different tack than the complete original quote “whom the gods would destroy they first make mad,” as the lyrics reveal:
whom the gods would destroy
they’ll first make humble
dreams made of clay
shatter and crumble
tumble their way
to a graveyard in timewhom the gods would destroy
they’ll gather like cattle
deafen their minds
trumpets with battle
visions of days
full of glorious timesyes the gods would destroy
ignore all the sages
the whisper of peace
sin and its wages
speak right out loud
against all the inhuman crimewell it’s dust to dust
yes we’ll all fall down
dust to dust
turn to dust on the groundand the gods will decide
for always and ever
as they side by side
march into never
one weary path
for the hawk and the doveyes the gods would destroy
the victors the vanquished
the high and the low
a world that is anguished
a world that has failed
forgotten how to lovewell it’s dust to dust
we’ll all fall down
dust to dust
turn to dust on the groundwe’ll all fall down
Hardly your average praise and worship chorus, what say?
To me, the song speaks deeply of the reality facing us all. This isn’t simply a warning to the godless and God haters. It addresses those of us who do believe, and in a fashion we may find more than a little uncomfortable.
When we puff ourselves up with pride over not being like “they” are, what are we doing? Seriously, what are we doing? Are we so ignorant of what Christ said: “To some who were confident of their own righteousness and looked down on everybody else, Jesus told this parable: ‘Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood up and prayed about himself: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men — robbers, evildoers, adulterers — or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get.’ But the tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, ‘God, have mercy on me, a sinner.’ I tell you that this man, rather than the other, went home justified before God. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.” Who was He talking to at the time — the tax collectors? No. As it says, He was talking to those who were confident of their own righteousness and looked down on everyone else. What other description can there be of those who foam with rage at the machinations of those with opposing political views, stating unequivocally they are in error before God and man? Yet when they speak to them, or more correctly said at them, they bring no witness. Instead, they attack those they disagree with, their words etched with hatred and scorn. This should not be so. Yet it is so.
What can be said of those who claim to be correct yet behave in such an incorrect manner? How can one boast of being on God’s side when their actions are anything but Christ-like? It’s not that being Christ-like is a call to weakness. Jesus didn’t settle for giving the moneychangers and merchants plying their trade in the Temple a verbal rebuke. He physically drove them out.
He also died for them.
And we are unwilling to do so much as extend a hand of kindness?
Why do we criticize the left? On what grounds? Ideological? Practical? Philosophical? Intellectual? Fine. But are we so pure we can point to ourselves and say “we are not like you?” We are the ones who have turned conservative causes into a lucrative moneymaking exercise for ourselves. We are the ones who claim to be on God’s side yet promote the godless and God haters because they generate revenue (case in point: Michelle Malkin and Allahpundit, Hugh Hewitt and Christopher Hitchens). And we are proud? Of what?!!
In Christ there is no liberal or conservative truth. There is only His truth. In Christ there is no validation of the Republican or Democratic platform. There is only His own validation of Himself. In Christ there is no politics. There is only the promise of His peace in a world that knows no peace.
What are His commands? Cap and trade? Lord over each other? No. Love each other. Feed the poor. Clothe the naked. Comfort the sick. Protect and defend ourselves and each other against the attacks of those who are evil. We can and do differ on how best to accomplish these things. But on these things there is no difference.
Whom the gods would destroy? It’s us. All of us unless we humble ourselves and become still before God, knowing that He is God. Otherwise, we are the ones who face destruction no matter our political affiliation.
“Why, Cherie…”
May 23rd
“… hold still for our portrait.”
I’m going to resume working on my Gord the polar bear book effective immediately. Found the artist I want to illustrate it, and she’s agreed to give it a go once the book is complete. Don’t know when that’ll be, but it should be this year.
I’ve realized a huge chunk of my lethargic attitude toward writing lately is general lack of enthusiasm for most any given subject at any given time. I’ve pretty much said everything I have to say on politics, and while there’s never a lack of things to say about faith and Jesus unless I have something pressed on my heart to say it’d be forced product and not something genuine. Best to find my niche and fill it. Which is where Gord comes in.
Wish me luck, and I’ll keep you posted. Or should I say, “Why, wish me luck.” Which won’t mean a thing unless you’re familiar with Gord the polar bear and his friend Cherie the brown thrasher.
In God’s Not Dead (And Neither Are We) news, I’m scheduled for a radio interview next Tuesday May 26th on RIMMERAMA, a program hosted by Mike Rimmer on radio station Cross Rhythms in the UK and available online at www.crossrhythms.co.uk. I’ll be on at 2:15 PM EDT.
A Bit Of Book News, Best Read With A Spot Of Tea
May 22nd
If you’re reading this in England you can now buy the book domestically at Cross Rhythms’ online store (link here). Working on how best to publicize it there; doing the whole marketing bit about calculating costs of advertising through different mediums and measuring them against number of impressions (how many people will probably see an ad at whichever location it may be), average returns as defined by number of sales per number of impressions, from this working out the ROI (return on investment) which is not to be confused with RIO and a cherry ice cream smile. I suppose it’s very nice. And I almost sound like I know what I’m talking about with all that jargon, don’t I. Scary.
The other option is saying “it’s a ministry!” and throwing money around like it’s no object in an effort to get the word out… oh, wait, I can’t afford that. Still, it is a ministry, so you have to factor that into the marketing equation.
I’ll work out a plan. Hopefully sooner rather than later!


