<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dead Heart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldfishandclowns.com/2009/06/02/dead-heart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldfishandclowns.com/2009/06/02/dead-heart/</link>
	<description>Home of the jester in the court of the ragtag soldiers, where God&#039;s not dead and neither are we.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Never-Ending Story (In A Fashion) - Goldfish And Clowns</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfishandclowns.com/2009/06/02/dead-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>The Never-Ending Story (In A Fashion) - Goldfish And Clowns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfishandclowns.com/?p=1627#comment-982</guid>
		<description>[...] week I said my piece twice (here and here) about the Playboy article on conservative women.  No need to reiterate all that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I said my piece twice (here and here) about the Playboy article on conservative women.  No need to reiterate all that. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be The Better - Goldfish And Clowns</title>
		<link>http://www.goldfishandclowns.com/2009/06/02/dead-heart/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Be The Better - Goldfish And Clowns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldfishandclowns.com/?p=1627#comment-975</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday, I briefly ruminated about why the now-infamous Playboy article from earlier this week discussing assorted conservative women in decidedly less than genteel terms wasn&#8217;t that big of a deal to me.  Apparently I am alone in feeling this way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday, I briefly ruminated about why the now-infamous Playboy article from earlier this week discussing assorted conservative women in decidedly less than genteel terms wasn&#8217;t that big of a deal to me.  Apparently I am alone in feeling this way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

